X-Original-To: pgsql-sql-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.144]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC5B832B014 for ; Tue, 12 Oct 2004 14:41:32 +0100 (BST) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 17136-04 for ; Tue, 12 Oct 2004 13:41:18 +0000 (GMT) Received: from web11.manitu.net (web11.manitu.net [217.11.48.111]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFEFF32AE3F for ; Tue, 12 Oct 2004 14:41:21 +0100 (BST) Received: from [62.165.4.166] (dicaprio.akademie1.de [62.165.4.166]) (authenticated) by web11.manitu.net (8.10.2-SOL3/8.10.2) with ESMTP id i9CDfEC02569 for ; Tue, 12 Oct 2004 15:41:14 +0200 Subject: Re: PL/pgSQL, RETURN NEXT, ORDER From: Markus Bertheau To: "'pgsql-sql@postgresql.org'" In-Reply-To: <1097587488.2649.28.camel@dicaprio.akademie1.de> References: <1097587488.2649.28.camel@dicaprio.akademie1.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Message-Id: <1097588475.2649.31.camel@dicaprio.akademie1.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 (1.4.6-2) Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2004 15:41:15 +0200 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 tagged_above=0.0 required=5.0 tests= X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200410/84 X-Sequence-Number: 19187 =D0=92 =D0=92=D1=82=D1=80, 12.10.2004, =D0=B2 15:24, Markus Bertheau =D0=BF= =D0=B8=D1=88=D0=B5=D1=82: > Is the order of the rows guaranteed to be preserved? Neil clarified on IRC that - there is no interface guarantee - in the current implementation the order is preserved - a future implementation is likely to change that Thanks. --=20 Markus Bertheau