X-Original-To: pgsql-sql-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.144]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B903C8B9B72 for ; Tue, 1 Feb 2005 16:59:13 +0000 (GMT) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 92020-08 for ; Tue, 1 Feb 2005 16:59:10 +0000 (GMT) Received: from koolancexeon.g2switchworks.com (mail.g2switchworks.com [63.87.162.25]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF4098B9B6A for ; Tue, 1 Feb 2005 16:59:10 +0000 (GMT) Received: mail.g2switchworks.com 10.10.1.8 from 10.10.1.37 10.10.1.37 via HTTP with MS-WebStorage 6.5.6944 Received: from state.g2switchworks.com by mail.g2switchworks.com; 01 Feb 2005 10:59:07 -0600 Subject: Re: MSSQL versus Postgres timing From: Scott Marlowe To: Joel Fradkin Cc: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org In-Reply-To: <000001c5087e$b92ddfa0$797ba8c0@jfradkin> References: <000001c5087e$b92ddfa0$797ba8c0@jfradkin> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <1107277147.16640.162.camel@state.g2switchworks.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 (1.4.6-2) Date: Tue, 01 Feb 2005 10:59:07 -0600 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.001 tagged_above=0 required=5 tests=AWL X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200502/25 X-Sequence-Number: 20136 On Tue, 2005-02-01 at 10:54, Joel Fradkin wrote: > All is moving along well. >=20 > I have all my views and data and am testing things out a bit. >=20 > A table with 645,000 records for associates has view (basically select > * from tblassociates where clientnum =3D =E2=80=98test=E2=80=99) What does=20 explain analyze select * from tblassociates where clientnum =3D =E2=80=98te= st=E2=80=99=20 say?