X-Original-To: pgsql-sql-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.144]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2CF4533A8 for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 21:42:03 +0100 (BST) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 37706-06 for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 20:42:00 +0000 (GMT) Received: from koolancexeon.g2switchworks.com (mail.g2switchworks.com [63.87.162.25]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 414755321A for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 21:41:59 +0100 (BST) Received: mail.g2switchworks.com 10.10.1.8 from 10.10.1.37 10.10.1.37 via HTTP with MS-WebStorage 6.5.6944 Received: from state.g2switchworks.com by mail.g2switchworks.com; 08 Apr 2005 15:42:01 -0500 Subject: Re: getting count for a specific querry From: Scott Marlowe To: Bob Henkel Cc: Vivek Khera , pgsql-sql@postgresql.org In-Reply-To: <762e5c05040813354436bd27@mail.gmail.com> References: <003b01c53c70$6ff184b0$797ba8c0@jfradkin> <762e5c05040813354436bd27@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <1112992921.20921.84.camel@state.g2switchworks.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 (1.4.6-2) Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2005 15:42:01 -0500 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.003 tagged_above=0 required=5 tests=AWL X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200504/124 X-Sequence-Number: 21017 On Fri, 2005-04-08 at 15:35, Bob Henkel wrote: > On Apr 8, 2005 3:23 PM, Vivek Khera wrote: > On Apr 8, 2005, at 3:23 PM, Joel Fradkin wrote: > > > I set up the data on 4 10k scsi drives in a powervault and > my wal on 2 > > 15k > > drives. I am using links to those from the install > directory. It > > starts and > > stops ok this way, but maybe it should be different. > > > > Your problem might just be the choice of using a Dell RAID > controller. > I have a 1 year old box connected to a 14 disk powervault > (PowerEdge > 2650) and it is dog slow compared to a dual opteron with 8 > disks that > is replacing it. It is all I/O for me, and the dell's just > are not > known for speedy I/O. > > Vivek Khera, Ph.D. > +1-301-869-4449 x806 > > > > But that is relative I would think. Is the Dell RAID much faster than > my desktop SATA drive with no RAID? I'm by any means as knowledgeable > about I/O setup as many of you are but my 2 cents wonders if the Dell > RAID is really that much slower than a competitively priced/speced > alternative? Would Joel's problems just fade away if he wasn't using > a Dell RAID? My experience with the 3i controllers (See my earlier post) was that my old Pentium Pro200x2 machine with 512 meg ram and a generic Ultra Wide SCSI card and a half dozen drives running software RAID 5 was faster. Seriously. So was my P-II-350 desktop with the same controller, and an older Dual P-III-750 with only UltraSCSI running in a RAID-1 mirror set. The 3I is REALLY slow (or at least WAS slow) under linux.