X-Original-To: pgsql-sql-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org
Received: from localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144])
	by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE08FDA3AD
	for <pgsql-sql-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org>;
	Thu,  6 Oct 2005 08:52:39 -0300 (ADT)
Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71])
	by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id 31870-01
	for <pgsql-sql-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org>;
	Thu,  6 Oct 2005 11:52:34 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from ms005msg.fastwebnet.it (ms005msg.fastwebnet.it [213.140.2.50])
	by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF09ADA3AA
	for <pgsql-sql@postgresql.org>; Thu,  6 Oct 2005 08:52:34 -0300 (ADT)
Received: from lyra (1.17.192.122) by ms005msg.fastwebnet.it (7.2.060.2)
	id 43224E39005FFEA0; Thu, 6 Oct 2005 13:52:32 +0200
Received: from localhost (lyra [127.0.0.1])
	by lyra (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF970197368;
	Thu,  6 Oct 2005 13:52:45 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from lyra ([127.0.0.1])
	by localhost (lyra [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP
	id 10474-02; Thu,  6 Oct 2005 13:52:43 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by lyra (Postfix, from userid 1003)
	id 95A90197367; Thu,  6 Oct 2005 13:52:43 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: Re: Noob question about types and lists
From: xchris <lyralyra@fastmail.fm>
To: Richard Huxton <dev@archonet.com>
Cc: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
In-Reply-To: <4345088E.4090001@archonet.com>
References: <1128595206.27646.18.camel@lyra> <4345088E.4090001@archonet.com>
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Thu, 06 Oct 2005 13:52:43 +0200
Message-Id: <1128599563.27646.35.camel@lyra>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.3 
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at lyra
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.682 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.062,
	DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE=0.374, RCVD_ILLEGAL_IP=1.37]
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Archive-Number: 200510/51
X-Sequence-Number: 22904

On gio, 2005-10-06 at 12:20 +0100, Richard Huxton wrote:

>  From the manuals...
> 

I didn't search very well.Sorry!

> 
> However - I don't think you want to anyway. If you're going to use a 
> relational database, try a relational approach! Typically, you would do 
> something like [cut]

I wanted to use a different approch because addresses don't make any
sense for other tables and because they are typically few (3,4) and i
wanted to avoid making a join for this task... 
however.. i will use your approch.

Thank you for patience and suggestion!
Regards

Chris