X-Original-To: pgsql-sql-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C4979DC800 for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 17:12:11 -0400 (AST) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 04142-06 for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 17:12:12 -0400 (AST) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey- Received: from kiwi.adonten.net (kiwi.adonten.net [204.157.14.138]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21F969DC865 for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 17:12:08 -0400 (AST) Received: (qmail 16226 invoked from network); 18 Dec 2005 21:12:06 -0000 Received: from localhost (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 18 Dec 2005 21:12:06 -0000 Received: from 82-70-183-14.dsl.in-addr.zen.co.uk (82-70-183-14.dsl.in-addr.zen.co.uk [82.70.183.14]) by webmail.adontendev.net (IMP) with HTTP for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 21:12:05 +0000 Message-ID: <1134940325.43a5d0a5a882e@webmail.adontendev.net> Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2005 21:12:05 +0000 From: frank church To: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org Subject: Does VACUUM reorder tables on clustered indices MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 3.2.3 X-Originating-IP: 82.70.183.14 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 required=5 tests=[none] X-Spam-Score: 0 X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200512/148 X-Sequence-Number: 23690 Does VACUUMing reorder tables on clustered indices or is it only the CLUSTER command that can do that? / r church ---------------------------------------------------------------- This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.