Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([192.204.191.242])
	by postgresql.org (8.11.3/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f5HK2Da92458;
	Sun, 17 Jun 2001 16:02:13 -0400 (EDT)
	(envelope-from tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us)
Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.11.4/8.11.4) with ESMTP id f5HK29311741;
	Sun, 17 Jun 2001 16:02:09 -0400 (EDT)
To: Jie Liang <jliang@ipinc.com>
cc: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org, pgsql-admin@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [SQL] Re: need urgent help 
In-reply-to: <Pine.BSF.4.10.10106171249000.95993-100000@tidal.ipinc.com> 
References: <Pine.BSF.4.10.10106171249000.95993-100000@tidal.ipinc.com>
Comments: In-reply-to Jie Liang <jliang@ipinc.com>
	message dated "Sun, 17 Jun 2001 13:00:26 -0700"
Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2001 16:02:08 -0400
Message-ID: <11738.992808128@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
X-Archive-Number: 200106/101
X-Sequence-Number: 1658

Jie Liang <jliang@ipinc.com> writes:
> the original schema includes another constraint which using a user defined
> function to check whether url is validate or not.

So are you saying it was just a bug in this user-defined function?
Or is there something we need to investigate?

			regards, tom lane