X-Original-To: pgsql-sql-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org
Received: from localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144])
	by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CD39D9F19
	for <pgsql-sql-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org>;
	Wed,  2 Nov 2005 19:22:36 -0400 (AST)
Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71])
	by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id 49503-06
	for <pgsql-sql-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org>;
	Wed,  2 Nov 2005 23:22:33 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us (sss.pgh.pa.us [66.207.139.130])
	by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB170D9E13
	for <pgsql-sql@postgresql.org>; Wed,  2 Nov 2005 19:22:34 -0400 (AST)
Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id jA2NMEqM011867;
	Wed, 2 Nov 2005 18:22:14 -0500 (EST)
To: Axel Rau <Axel.Rau@Chaos1.DE>
Cc: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Poor performance in inet << cidr join (Resolved) 
In-reply-to: <60328928649b77f3e95a407d47b400eb@Chaos1.DE> 
References: <a366b1ecc7f4d6f4b139106cf524f2e7@Chaos1.DE>
	<60328928649b77f3e95a407d47b400eb@Chaos1.DE>
Comments: In-reply-to Axel Rau <Axel.Rau@Chaos1.DE>
	message dated "Wed, 02 Nov 2005 23:07:39 +0100"
Date: Wed, 02 Nov 2005 18:22:14 -0500
Message-ID: <11866.1130973734@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.006 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.006]
X-Spam-Score: 0.006
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Archive-Number: 200511/36
X-Sequence-Number: 23288

Axel Rau <Axel.Rau@Chaos1.DE> writes:
> Question: Can rtree_inet be included in the core?

No, because rtree is going away in 8.2.  Feel like converting that
code to be a GIST opclass, instead?

			regards, tom lane