Received: from maia.hub.org (unknown [200.46.204.183]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1494634C1A; Fri, 5 Mar 2010 04:21:17 -0400 (AST) Received: from mail.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86]) by maia.hub.org (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.183]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 85118-07; Fri, 5 Mar 2010 08:21:07 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from hermes.vectorsf.com (firewall.vectorsf.com [62.82.80.62]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E48B634EDE; Fri, 5 Mar 2010 04:21:06 -0400 (AST) Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by hermes.vectorsf.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5830E11C024A; Fri, 5 Mar 2010 09:21:03 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at hermes.vectorsf.com Received: from hermes.vectorsf.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (hermes.vectorsf.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8i3frrQHLHN4; Fri, 5 Mar 2010 09:20:59 +0100 (CET) Received: from [10.70.4.200] (unknown [10.70.4.200]) (Authenticated sender: imartinez) by hermes.vectorsf.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AA6D11C024B; Fri, 5 Mar 2010 09:20:59 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: PostgreSQL Active-Active Configuration From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?I=F1igo?= Martinez Lasala To: dclements89@gmail.com Cc: pgsql-admin@postgresql.org, pgsql-sql In-Reply-To: <1f30b80c1003042325s6235405bsc914bb13b74dd577@mail.gmail.com> References: <1f30b80c1003042325s6235405bsc914bb13b74dd577@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=-3pGbdaKWuw+agYL/3+hT" Date: Fri, 05 Mar 2010 09:20:59 +0100 Message-ID: <1267777259.17535.372.camel@deimos> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.28.1 X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.598 tagged_above=-10 required=5 tests=BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001 X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 201003/41 X-Sequence-Number: 33840 --=-3pGbdaKWuw+agYL/3+hT Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Until now, the only solution that has worked for us is pg_pool, but is not always possible to use it. For example, if you use functions or sentences that make use of timestamp, random, etc it won't be possible to use pg_pool since each node will have a different value. If not, it could probably work for you. -----Original Message----- From: Dave Clements Reply-to: dclements89@gmail.com To: pgsql-admin@postgresql.org, pgsql-sql Subject: [ADMIN] PostgreSQL Active-Active Configuration Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2010 18:25:24 +1100 Hi everyone, I am looking for some Master-Master replication solutions for PostgreSQL database. Please let me know if you are using one and if you are happy with the performance. Thanks --=-3pGbdaKWuw+agYL/3+hT Content-Type: text/html; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Until now, the only solution that has worked for us is pg_pool, but is not always possible to use it.
For example, if you use functions or sentences that make use of timestamp, random, etc it won't be possible to use pg_pool since each node will have a different value.
If not, it could probably work for you.

-----Original Message-----
From: Dave Clements <dclements89@gmail.com>
Reply-to: dclements89@gmail.com
To: pgsql-admin@postgresql.org, pgsql-sql <pgsql-sql@postgresql.org>
Subject: [ADMIN] PostgreSQL Active-Active Configuration
Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2010 18:25:24 +1100

Hi everyone,

I am looking for some Master-Master replication solutions for
PostgreSQL database. Please let me know if you are using one and if
you are happy with the performance.



Thanks


--=-3pGbdaKWuw+agYL/3+hT--