Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.183])
	by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAE5E9FB507
	for <pgsql-sql-postgresql.org@postgresql.org>;
	Fri, 21 Sep 2007 20:33:10 -0300 (ADT)
Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71])
	by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.183]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id 87291-06 for <pgsql-sql-postgresql.org@postgresql.org>;
	Fri, 21 Sep 2007 20:33:07 -0300 (ADT)
X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.5
Received: from web31811.mail.mud.yahoo.com (web31811.mail.mud.yahoo.com
	[68.142.207.74]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9AC919FB4D3
	for <pgsql-sql@postgresql.org>; Fri, 21 Sep 2007 20:33:07 -0300 (ADT)
Received: (qmail 50021 invoked by uid 60001); 21 Sep 2007 23:33:06 -0000
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com;
	h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-ID;
	b=0cSYIkRNKrzk2StInHhb5iJGyn3LZ0Tkwc51ePHjMXHKzuD0Q3OcpZsl1So50N5FhOpwKcz8csM3W6zdBG0127TVrS+Ot5+8d6Z7AYRIA+kpIrB68vX7Eu6AF7QjBOciu2aJEov94enaug42orJdXuv+O9mkCUyoNyH9nsV3uzo=;
X-YMail-OSG: 
 9IOq09EVM1meBISPkTxKJRwBMrkyAF4Zdfph3nEMRfaufZ5Ht9htQHDJ4gWqKtMgtVTDcw--
Received: from [75.84.89.248] by web31811.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP;
	Fri, 21 Sep 2007 16:33:06 PDT
Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 16:33:06 -0700 (PDT)
From: Richard Broersma Jr <rabroersma@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: Many databases
To: Stefan Arentz <stefan.arentz@gmail.com>
Cc: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
In-Reply-To: <adf34c300709211616g361ad0d4x389e1566299f6441@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Message-ID: <128775.49825.qm@web31811.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.429 tagged_above=0 required=5 tests=AWL=0.428,
	BAYES_50=0.001
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Archive-Number: 200709/140
X-Sequence-Number: 29353


--- Stefan Arentz <stefan.arentz@gmail.com> wrote:

> Well I'm just toying with an idea. The problem I'm facing is that I
> would like clients to only see the tuples that they have created and
> own. I guess I'll just skip direct sql access to the db and write some
> API on top of it that manages the data. Not a big deal but it
> complicates things :-)

The veil project already does this.

Regards,
Richard Broersma Jr.