X-Original-To: pgsql-sql-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.144]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C647329E72 for ; Sun, 12 Sep 2004 06:55:29 +0100 (BST) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 47794-09 for ; Sun, 12 Sep 2004 05:55:24 +0000 (GMT) Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us (sss.pgh.pa.us [66.207.139.130]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB7CB329C82 for ; Sun, 12 Sep 2004 06:55:24 +0100 (BST) Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i8C5tN2H012900; Sun, 12 Sep 2004 01:55:23 -0400 (EDT) To: m0ntar3@cox.net Cc: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org Subject: Re: create unique index schema.index_name on table (column)? In-reply-to: <8rJ0d.57642$nk.2844@okepread05> References: <8rJ0d.57642$nk.2844@okepread05> Comments: In-reply-to m0ntar3@cox.net message dated "Sat, 11 Sep 2004 15:42:46 -0500" Date: Sun, 12 Sep 2004 01:55:22 -0400 Message-ID: <12899.1094968522@sss.pgh.pa.us> From: Tom Lane X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 tagged_above=0.0 required=5.0 tests= X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200409/92 X-Sequence-Number: 18938 m0ntar3@cox.net writes: > Is the syntax "schema_name.index_name" for create unique index wrong, > unsupported or what? Yes. Put the schema name on the table, instead. regards, tom lane