X-Original-To: pgsql-sql-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.144]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F73F32A150 for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 15:05:19 +0100 (BST) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 45734-05 for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 14:05:14 +0000 (GMT) Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us (sss.pgh.pa.us [66.207.139.130]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CC1532A05A for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 15:05:17 +0100 (BST) Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id i8SE5F0g014193; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 10:05:15 -0400 (EDT) To: Achilleus Mantzios Cc: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org Subject: Re: FOREIGN KEY and AccessExclusiveLock In-reply-to: References: Comments: In-reply-to Achilleus Mantzios message dated "Tue, 28 Sep 2004 09:14:20 +0300" Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 10:05:14 -0400 Message-ID: <14192.1096380314@sss.pgh.pa.us> From: Tom Lane X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 tagged_above=0.0 required=5.0 tests= X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200409/243 X-Sequence-Number: 19089 Achilleus Mantzios writes: > Whats the purpose of the AccessExclusiveLock on parent table? We're adding a trigger to it. regards, tom lane