Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.191]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA7062E4A7B for ; Sat, 12 Jan 2008 01:29:15 -0400 (AST) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.191]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 07483-02-7 for ; Sat, 12 Jan 2008 01:29:12 -0400 (AST) Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us (sss.pgh.pa.us [66.207.139.130]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D3F82E468B for ; Sat, 12 Jan 2008 01:24:05 -0400 (AST) Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id m0C5O3Ol001443; Sat, 12 Jan 2008 00:24:03 -0500 (EST) To: "Rajesh Kumar Mallah" cc: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org Subject: Re: (possible) bug with constraint exclusion In-reply-to: References: <23924.1200081368@sss.pgh.pa.us> Comments: In-reply-to "Rajesh Kumar Mallah" message dated "Sat, 12 Jan 2008 10:30:43 +0530" Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2008 00:24:03 -0500 Message-ID: <1442.1200115443@sss.pgh.pa.us> From: Tom Lane X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200801/101 X-Sequence-Number: 29954 "Rajesh Kumar Mallah" writes: > Am I correct in understanding that the current behavior is inappropriate > and shall be corrected at some point of time in future versions ? It's a bug, it's patched: http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-committers/2008-01/msg00184.php regards, tom lane