X-Original-To: pgsql-sql-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org
Received: from localhost (unknown [64.117.224.193])
	by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 1A44C30F1E2; Tue, 17 Jun 2003 18:43:17 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([64.117.224.193])
	by localhost (svr1.postgresql.org [64.117.224.193]) (amavisd-new,
	port 10024)
	with ESMTP id 72461-04; Tue, 17 Jun 2003 15:43:06 -0300 (ADT)
Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us (unknown [192.204.191.242])
	by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 468A930F1EC; Tue, 17 Jun 2003 15:43:06 -0300 (ADT)
Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h5HIh2U6014458;
	Tue, 17 Jun 2003 14:43:02 -0400 (EDT)
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgreSQL.org, pgsql-sql@postgreSQL.org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Our FLOAT(p) precision does not conform to spec 
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0306171659440.2043-100000@peter.localdomain> 
References: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0306171659440.2043-100000@peter.localdomain>
Comments: In-reply-to Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
	message dated "Tue, 17 Jun 2003 20:04:42 +0200"
Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2003 14:43:02 -0400
Message-ID: <14457.1055875382@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
X-Archive-Number: 200306/199
X-Sequence-Number: 13957

Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
> Considering that the data type float(x) isn't documented anywhere, I'm not
> worried.

Good point ... I'll fix that while I'm at it ...

			regards, tom lane