X-Original-To: pgsql-sql-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.2]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DFFDD1BABA for ; Thu, 22 Apr 2004 23:06:11 -0300 (ADT) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (neptune.hub.org [200.46.204.2]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 09955-08 for ; Thu, 22 Apr 2004 23:06:12 -0300 (ADT) Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us (sss.pgh.pa.us [66.207.139.130]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1D23D1BACC for ; Thu, 22 Apr 2004 23:06:07 -0300 (ADT) Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i3N2694g014494; Thu, 22 Apr 2004 22:06:10 -0400 (EDT) To: "Dennis" Cc: "postgres SQL" Subject: Re: lifetime of temp schema versus compiled image of plpgsql proc In-reply-to: References: Comments: In-reply-to "Dennis" message dated "Thu, 22 Apr 2004 15:29:32 -0400" Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2004 22:06:09 -0400 Message-ID: <14493.1082685969@sss.pgh.pa.us> From: Tom Lane X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at postgresql.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 tagged_above=0.0 required=5.0 tests= X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200404/244 X-Sequence-Number: 17619 "Dennis" writes: > then on the same connection, I open a transaction, execute a plpgsql > function that populates the temp tables and the function bombs with this > error message: > ERROR: schema "pg_temp_8" does not exist That's a bit hard to believe. Could we see a complete test case? regards, tom lane