Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us (unknown [192.204.191.242])
	by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC4A04754A2
	for <pgsql-sql@postgresql.org>; Mon, 29 Jul 2002 02:11:59 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id g6T6BiVk014503;
	Mon, 29 Jul 2002 02:11:44 -0400 (EDT)
To: josh@agliodbs.com
Cc: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Abbr. for TIMESTAMP WITHOUT TIME ZONE? 
In-reply-to: <200207281653.07095.josh@agliodbs.com> 
References: <200207281653.07095.josh@agliodbs.com>
Comments: In-reply-to Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>
	message dated "Sun, 28 Jul 2002 16:53:07 -0700"
Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2002 02:11:44 -0400
Message-ID: <14502.1027923104@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
X-Archive-Number: 200207/429
X-Sequence-Number: 8807

Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> writes:
> I know that TIMESTAMP WITH TIME ZONE can be abbreviated "timestamptz".
> Surely there's an equivalent for WITHOUT?

As of 7.3, "timestamp" will be that abbreviation.  We're currently in
an interregnum as we move towards SQL-compliant interpretations of
these type names ...

			regards, tom lane