Received: from localhost (wm.hub.org [200.46.204.128])
	by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 992919FB269;
	Thu,  5 Oct 2006 22:36:39 -0300 (ADT)
Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71])
	by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.128]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id 71087-04; Fri,  6 Oct 2006 01:36:36 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-
Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us (sss.pgh.pa.us [66.207.139.130])
	by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B93919FB208;
	Thu,  5 Oct 2006 22:36:35 -0300 (ADT)
Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k961aY1Q014512;
	Thu, 5 Oct 2006 21:36:34 -0400 (EDT)
To: Michael Glaesemann <grzm@seespotcode.net>
cc: gdavis@refractions.net, pgsql-sql@postgresql.org,
	pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] timestamp subtraction (was Re: formatting intervals
	with to_char)
In-reply-to: <D80BBF3A-8C07-4337-8DD9-B4B713247C04@seespotcode.net> 
References: <4522EC42.1080500@refractions.net>
 <21619.1160067054@sss.pgh.pa.us>
	<D80BBF3A-8C07-4337-8DD9-B4B713247C04@seespotcode.net>
Comments: In-reply-to Michael Glaesemann <grzm@seespotcode.net>
	message dated "Fri, 06 Oct 2006 10:32:59 +0900"
Date: Thu, 05 Oct 2006 21:36:34 -0400
Message-ID: <14511.1160098594@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1
X-Archive-Number: 200610/75
X-Sequence-Number: 26464

Michael Glaesemann <grzm@seespotcode.net> writes:
> Considering how late it is in the cycle, perhaps the change in  
> behavior should come in 8.3.

Yeah, there's not really enough time to think through the consequences
now.  I'd like to experiment with it for 8.3 though.

			regards, tom lane