Received: from localhost (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
	by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id E7122476141; Sun,  6 Oct 2002 23:20:40 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us (unknown [192.204.191.242])
	by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 3D9E8476086; Sun,  6 Oct 2002 23:20:40 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id g973KYhR015764;
	Sun, 6 Oct 2002 23:20:34 -0400 (EDT)
To: Curt Sampson <cjs@cynic.net>
Cc: pgsql-general <pgsql-general@postgresql.org>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Subject: cross-posts (was Re: Large databases, performance)
In-reply-to: <Pine.NEB.4.44.0210071124410.443-100000@angelic.cynic.net> 
References: <Pine.NEB.4.44.0210071124410.443-100000@angelic.cynic.net>
Comments: In-reply-to Curt Sampson <cjs@cynic.net>
	message dated "Mon, 07 Oct 2002 11:27:04 +0900"
Date: Sun, 06 Oct 2002 23:20:33 -0400
Message-ID: <15763.1033960833@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS new-20020517
X-Archive-Number: 200210/330
X-Sequence-Number: 31328

Curt Sampson <cjs@cynic.net> writes:
> ... Avoiding cross-posting would be nice, since I am getting lots of
> duplicate messages these days.

Cross-posting is a fact of life, and in fact encouraged, on the pg
lists.  I suggest adapting.  Try sending
	set all unique your-email-address
to the PG majordomo server; this sets you up to get only one copy
of each cross-posted message.

			regards, tom lane