X-Original-To: pgsql-admin-postgresql.org@postgresql.org Received: from localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.208.251]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3DE79FA4C8 for ; Fri, 28 Jul 2006 01:17:59 -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.208.251]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 99346-02 for ; Fri, 28 Jul 2006 01:17:32 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey- Received: from svr4.postgresql.org (svr4.postgresql.org [66.98.251.159]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95BD89FB21A for ; Fri, 28 Jul 2006 01:17:33 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.3 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us (sss.pgh.pa.us [66.207.139.130]) by svr4.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B2715AFB18 for ; Fri, 28 Jul 2006 04:17:20 +0000 (GMT) Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k6S4Awcb016122; Fri, 28 Jul 2006 00:10:58 -0400 (EDT) To: Daniel CAUNE Cc: "'D'Arcy J.M. Cain'" , "'Daniel Caune'" , pgsql-admin@postgresql.org, pgsql-sql@postgresql.org Subject: Re: [SQL] PostgreSQL server terminated by signal 11 In-reply-to: <0J33006NWI0FI840@VL-MO-MR003.ip.videotron.ca> References: <0J33006NWI0FI840@VL-MO-MR003.ip.videotron.ca> Comments: In-reply-to Daniel CAUNE message dated "Fri, 28 Jul 2006 00:05:06 -0400" Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2006 00:10:58 -0400 Message-ID: <16121.1154059858@sss.pgh.pa.us> From: Tom Lane X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.609 tagged_above=0 required=5 tests=AWL, SPF_FAIL X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200607/254 X-Sequence-Number: 22500 Daniel CAUNE writes: > Actually it seems, from the source code, that a null slot->tts_tuple > won't lead to a segmentation fault in function slot_attisnull, while > slot and slot->tts_tupleDescriptor will. I'll bet on D'Arcy's theory that slot is being passed in as NULL. Exactly why remains to be seen ... we need that stack trace! regards, tom lane