Received: from localhost (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFE28477861 for ; Tue, 28 Jan 2003 22:27:01 -0500 (EST) Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us (unknown [192.204.191.242]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05826479C8C for ; Tue, 28 Jan 2003 21:18:26 -0500 (EST) Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.12.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id h0T2IH5u016847; Tue, 28 Jan 2003 21:18:17 -0500 (EST) To: =?iso-8859-1?B?UmljYXJkbyBKYXZpZXIgQXJhbmliYXIgTGXzbg==?= Cc: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org, ricardo_jal@linuxmail.org Subject: Re: Problem with query In-reply-to: References: Comments: In-reply-to =?iso-8859-1?B?UmljYXJkbyBKYXZpZXIgQXJhbmliYXIgTGXzbg==?= message dated "Tue, 28 Jan 2003 21:00:18 +0000" Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2003 21:18:16 -0500 Message-ID: <16846.1043806696@sss.pgh.pa.us> From: Tom Lane X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS new-20020517 X-Archive-Number: 200301/452 X-Sequence-Number: 11317 =?iso-8859-1?B?UmljYXJkbyBKYXZpZXIgQXJhbmliYXIgTGXzbg==?= writes: > I used PostgreSQL 7.0.3 Please consider upgrading to something more recent. 7.0 predates a lot of work we've done on query optimization ... regards, tom lane