X-Original-To: pgsql-sql-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org
Received: from localhost (unknown [64.117.224.193])
	by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A358530E6B0
	for <pgsql-sql-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org>;
	Tue, 10 Jun 2003 02:49:01 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([64.117.224.193])
	by localhost (svr1.postgresql.org [64.117.224.193]) (amavisd-new,
	port 10024) with ESMTP id 13817-04
	for <pgsql-sql-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org>;
	Mon,  9 Jun 2003 23:48:51 -0300 (ADT)
Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us (unknown [192.204.191.242])
	by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24D9B310B00
	for <pgsql-sql@postgresql.org>; Mon,  9 Jun 2003 14:06:19 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h59E6HU6017142;
	Mon, 9 Jun 2003 10:06:17 -0400 (EDT)
To: Eivind Kvedalen <eivindkv@ifi.uio.no>
Cc: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: "Join" on delimeter aggregate query 
In-reply-to: <Pine.SOL.4.51.0306091020450.2075@fimm.ifi.uio.no> 
References: <200306061003.29430.mike@nachbaur.com>
	<Pine.SOL.4.51.0306072257180.25070@tva.ifi.uio.no>
	<3649.1055120755@sss.pgh.pa.us>
	<Pine.SOL.4.51.0306091020450.2075@fimm.ifi.uio.no>
Comments: In-reply-to Eivind Kvedalen <eivindkv@ifi.uio.no>
	message dated "Mon, 09 Jun 2003 10:35:10 +0200"
Date: Mon, 09 Jun 2003 10:06:16 -0400
Message-ID: <17141.1055167576@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
X-Archive-Number: 200306/66
X-Sequence-Number: 13824

Eivind Kvedalen <eivindkv@ifi.uio.no> writes:
> Ok. What I actually had in mind was whether the optimizer would remove the
> ORDER BY clause completely or not,

No.  If you put an ORDER BY in a subselect, I think the system should
honor it.

			regards, tom lane