Received: from localhost (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8150A476400 for ; Thu, 2 Jan 2003 01:16:29 -0500 (EST) Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us (unknown [192.204.191.242]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88EA8476391 for ; Thu, 2 Jan 2003 01:16:28 -0500 (EST) Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.12.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id h026GNd0017936; Thu, 2 Jan 2003 01:16:23 -0500 (EST) To: Minghann Ho Cc: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org Subject: Re: bug? In-reply-to: <200301021736.23383.mho@mcs.vuw.ac.nz> References: <200301021736.23383.mho@mcs.vuw.ac.nz> Comments: In-reply-to Minghann Ho message dated "Thu, 02 Jan 2003 17:36:23 +1300" Date: Thu, 02 Jan 2003 01:16:23 -0500 Message-ID: <17935.1041488183@sss.pgh.pa.us> From: Tom Lane X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS new-20020517 X-Archive-Number: 200301/14 X-Sequence-Number: 10879 Minghann Ho writes: > The following SELECT are errors?! No, they're not. PG follows the ISO definition of week numbers: Monday is the first day of the week, and the first week of a year is the first one containing a Thursday. regards, tom lane