Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us (unknown [192.204.191.242]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B86D4758E9; Thu, 14 Mar 2002 19:04:38 -0500 (EST) Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.11.4/8.11.4) with ESMTP id g2F03jS18292; Thu, 14 Mar 2002 19:03:45 -0500 (EST) To: Larry Rosenman Cc: "Oliver Elphick" , jie@stbernard.com, mail@joeconway.com, pgsql-admin@postgresql.org, pgsql-sql@postgresql.org, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org Subject: Re: [SQL] Syslog In-reply-to: <20020314173523.48cb2872.ler@lerctr.org> References: <7C760DAA511DC74B99E7D22189F786F1906DB1@MAIL01.stbernard.com> <1016140626.18213.98.camel@linda> <20020314173523.48cb2872.ler@lerctr.org> Comments: In-reply-to Larry Rosenman message dated "Thu, 14 Mar 2002 17:35:23 -0600" Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2002 19:03:45 -0500 Message-ID: <18289.1016150625@sss.pgh.pa.us> From: Tom Lane X-Archive-Number: 200203/219 X-Sequence-Number: 3753 Larry Rosenman writes: > Hackers: Is there any reason to NOT make --enable-syslog the default > any more? > I.E. can we change the sense of it to be --disable-syslog and have > USE_SYSLOG defined by default? I thought we'd agreed to do that already; at least Peter had indicated he planned to do it. I guess he didn't get around to it for 7.2. regards, tom lane