X-Original-To: pgsql-hackers-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org
Received: from localhost (unknown [64.117.224.130])
	by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68A9AD1B4EE
	for <pgsql-hackers-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org>;
	Mon,  8 Sep 2003 16:48:18 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([64.117.224.193])
	by localhost (neptune.hub.org [64.117.224.130]) (amavisd-new,
	port 10024) with ESMTP id 81416-02
	for <pgsql-hackers-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org>;
	Mon,  8 Sep 2003 13:47:47 -0300 (ADT)
Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us (unknown [192.204.191.242])
	by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD5C4D1B4E2
	for <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>;
	Mon,  8 Sep 2003 13:47:30 -0300 (ADT)
Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h88Gl5An019043;
	Mon, 8 Sep 2003 12:47:05 -0400 (EDT)
To: Doug McNaught <doug@mcnaught.org>
Cc: Andreas Pflug <pgadmin@pse-consulting.de>,
	pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: plpgsql doesn't coerce boolean expressions to boolean 
In-reply-to: <m3d6eb1bmu.fsf@varsoon.wireboard.com> 
References: <15403.1063035632@sss.pgh.pa.us>
 <3F5CAC68.30502@pse-consulting.de>
	<m3d6eb1bmu.fsf@varsoon.wireboard.com>
Comments: In-reply-to Doug McNaught <doug@mcnaught.org>
	message dated "08 Sep 2003 12:35:37 -0400"
Date: Mon, 08 Sep 2003 12:47:05 -0400
Message-ID: <19042.1063039625@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at postgresql.org
X-Archive-Number: 200309/556
X-Sequence-Number: 43568

Doug McNaught <doug@mcnaught.org> writes:
> I agree with another poster that deprecation in 7.4 and removal in
> 7.5 might make sense.

How would we "deprecate" it exactly?  Throw a NOTICE?

			regards, tom lane