X-Original-To: pgsql-sql-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (unknown [64.117.224.130]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 298E1D1B580; Fri, 3 Oct 2003 15:04:14 +0000 (GMT) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([64.117.224.193]) by localhost (neptune.hub.org [64.117.224.130]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 64003-10; Fri, 3 Oct 2003 12:03:25 -0300 (ADT) Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us (unknown [192.204.191.242]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC546D1B53C; Fri, 3 Oct 2003 12:03:24 -0300 (ADT) Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id h93F3Khn019578; Fri, 3 Oct 2003 11:03:20 -0400 (EDT) To: achill@matrix.gatewaynet.com Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org, pgsql-sql@postgresql.org Subject: Re: HeapTuple->t_tableOid==0 after SPI_exec In-reply-to: References: Comments: In-reply-to achill@matrix.gatewaynet.com message dated "Fri, 03 Oct 2003 18:04:47 +0300" Date: Fri, 03 Oct 2003 11:03:19 -0400 Message-ID: <19577.1065193399@sss.pgh.pa.us> From: Tom Lane X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at postgresql.org X-Archive-Number: 200310/44 X-Sequence-Number: 15444 achill@matrix.gatewaynet.com writes: > are there gonna be changes in SPI or internal structs in 7.4? No more than usual ;-). You will need to recompile shared libraries, but (in theory) source code changes shouldn't be needed. You might want to think about upgrading elog() calls to ereport() though. regards, tom lane