Received: from send106.yahoomail.com (send106.yahoomail.com [205.180.60.43])
	by hub.org (8.9.2/8.9.1) with SMTP id KAA94963
	for <pgsql-sql@hub.org>; Thu, 4 Feb 1999 10:22:56 -0500 (EST)
	(envelope-from tim_perdue@yahoo.com)
Message-ID: <19990204152438.25935.rocketmail@send106.yahoomail.com>
Received: from [204.167.169.69] by send106.yahoomail.com;
	Thu, 04 Feb 1999 07:24:38 PST
Date: Thu, 4 Feb 1999 07:24:38 -0800 (PST)
From: Tim Perdue <tim_perdue@yahoo.com>
Reply-To: tim@dmcity.net
Subject: Re: [SQL] Performance Question
To: vang@altavista.net, pgsql-sql@hub.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

Queries take a couple seconds on a PowerPC 604 @ 225Mhz, running
LinuxPPC R4 with 112MB RAM.

I have indexed the fld_mail_body but it doesn't seem to get used??

--Tim

---Viorel Anghel <vang@altavista.net> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Feb 03, 1999 at 08:25:25PM -0600, Tim Perdue wrote:
> > Please email directly to tim@dmcity.net.
> hmm, and CC to list, we also want to know ;-)
> 
> [snip]
> 
> > am I going to get killed with a performance hit?? It's running OK
now, with
> > the table at 20MB, but I have 100MB more worth of letters to drop
into the
> > table.....  8-)
> 
> 1. What does mean "OK now"? Just for my curiosity, on which machine
and
> which is the average time for such a query?
> 
> 2. Why don't you test with the rest of 100MB and tell us what is
happening?
> 
> -- 
>         ___
>        <o-o>    Viorel ANGHEL <vang@altavista.net>
>        [`-']    
>        -"-"-    
> 
> 

==
______________________________________________________

Tim Perdue
tim@perdue.net


_________________________________________________________
DO YOU YAHOO!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com