Message-ID: <19990309205018.A16780@Denninger.Net>
Date: Tue, 9 Mar 1999 20:50:18 -0600
From: Karl Denninger <karl@Denninger.Net>
To: Clark Evans <clark.evans@manhattanproject.com>,
	Tim Perdue <perdue@raccoon.com>
Cc: pgsql-sql@hub.org
Subject: Re: [SQL] Performance
References: <001701be6a95$f0aeee20$0b8c5aa5@timnt.weather.net>
	<36E5D919.15D11C54@manhattanproject.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
In-Reply-To: <36E5D919.15D11C54@manhattanproject.com>;
	from Clark Evans on Wed, Mar 10, 1999 at 02:29:45AM +0000
Organization: Karl's Sushi and Packet Smashers

On Wed, Mar 10, 1999 at 02:29:45AM +0000, Clark Evans wrote:
> Tim Perdue wrote:
> > BELIEVE IT OR NOT, PostgreSQL is handling 1.8GB in just one table, and its
> > performance is amazing. I have archived 1,100,000 emails in the database and
> > I don't really see much slowdown yet.
> 
> What is your hardware, os, etc?
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> Clark Evans

I have had tables exceeding 10GB in one dataset, and the performance wa
STILL excellent.  Hardware was a Pentium Pro 200, FreeBSD, and a CMD RAID
controller.

--
-- 
Karl Denninger (karl@denninger.net) http://www.mcs.net/~karl
I ain't even *authorized* to speak for anyone other than myself, so give
up now on trying to associate my words with any particular organization.