Received: from maia.hub.org (unknown [200.46.204.183])
	by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90A47632B8C
	for <pgsql-sql-postgresql.org@mail.postgresql.org>;
	Sun, 31 Jan 2010 21:09:43 -0400 (AST)
Received: from mail.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86])
	by maia.hub.org (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.183]) (amavisd-maia,
	port 10024) with ESMTP id 26513-01 for
	<pgsql-sql-postgresql.org@mail.postgresql.org>;
	Mon,  1 Feb 2010 01:09:32 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail-px0-f194.google.com (mail-px0-f194.google.com
	[209.85.216.194])
	by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5510632B35
	for <pgsql-sql@postgresql.org>; Sun, 31 Jan 2010 21:09:32 -0400 (AST)
Received: by pxi32 with SMTP id 32so3345104pxi.15
	for <pgsql-sql@postgresql.org>; Sun, 31 Jan 2010 17:09:31 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
	h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:reply-to:received
	:in-reply-to:references:from:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id
	:subject:to:cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
	bh=vEjhi5P/w5a8j46DUohwoZyvNmdldZyzYRXRk50NIHU=;
	b=Zz7FVbc4ETCAPqwabNxy6vXTKToninPGXGT56XSja2UAsnl0jVB2HTmiDCh/SPllvh
	tfG0as7OK+Ea0J8NkojUpegRLHzEeVhVstqUHrVGB9jhtlWbNK6ewIILmdov+mhvcx+s
	dQlOkE3xxx/ENjUZrlAQdgOmGeDFBU/Mjw22I=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
	h=mime-version:sender:reply-to:in-reply-to:references:from:date
	:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding;
	b=XJEjD+mK2uccicBZfeR4BRLPJYXpp1yoiABOp7pyq+/6M7sAvJ9wx4QPpfIBdsgoLc
	TjRtbcutVECSk7ofAAj0kFL5R40VOLuHHznS0s2wPx6Om1uHbLesmKs2Mx44DN1XsKtf
	Cp0lTcjk2Om2T8u0kCMbVxenYo21crwz6GBNw=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Reply-To: dclements89@gmail.com
Received: by 10.114.163.3 with SMTP id l3mr2604727wae.151.1264986571069; Sun,
	31 Jan 2010 17:09:31 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <dcc563d11001311704r2ae38a03r6b4dd739040565f7@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1f30b80c1001290049ub864091r8298fca3daa0eb69@mail.gmail.com>
	<1f30b80c1001311650q264dfda0uf9894cac3b9e0c3e@mail.gmail.com>
	<dcc563d11001311654j4e09a853p9b8f46b0312ba2ad@mail.gmail.com>
	<1f30b80c1001311702g3ed5e895gc6e504ffe23d7840@mail.gmail.com>
	<dcc563d11001311704r2ae38a03r6b4dd739040565f7@mail.gmail.com>
From: Dave Clements <dclements89@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2010 12:09:11 +1100
X-Google-Sender-Auth: c318b2c1fd491f0f
Message-ID: <1f30b80c1001311709u14758b64u162aad3ace527600@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Fwd: Help required on query performance
To: Scott Marlowe <scott.marlowe@gmail.com>
Cc: pgsql-sql <pgsql-sql@postgresql.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.599 tagged_above=-10 required=5
	tests=BAYES_00=-2.599
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Archive-Number: 201001/60
X-Sequence-Number: 33596

I did the re-analyze serveral times, using the command:

ANALYZE tablename;

Is there any other command as well or another way to do that?




On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 12:04 PM, Scott Marlowe <scott.marlowe@gmail.com> wr=
ote:
> On Sun, Jan 31, 2010 at 6:02 PM, Dave Clements <dclements89@gmail.com> wr=
ote:
>> Hi, following the output from explain analyze.
>
> Without doing any heavy analysis, it looks like your row estimates are
> way off. =A0Have you cranked up stats target and re-analyzed yet?
>