Received: from localhost.localdomain (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
	by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DCC647599C
	for <pgsql-sql@postgresql.org>; Fri, 17 May 2002 20:18:02 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from davinci.ethosmedia.com (davinci.ethosmedia.com [209.10.40.250])
	by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76787475481
	for <pgsql-sql@postgresql.org>; Fri, 17 May 2002 20:17:56 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from [209.122.114.82] (HELO chocolate-mousse)
	by davinci.ethosmedia.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 3.5.9)
	with ESMTP id 1463399 for pgsql-sql@postgresql.org;
	Fri, 17 May 2002 17:17:57 -0700
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="us-ascii"
From: Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>
Reply-To: josh@agliodbs.com
Organization: Aglio Database Solutions
To: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
Subject: PL/pgSQL TODO
Date: Fri, 17 May 2002 17:19:38 -0700
X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.4]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <200205171719.38290.josh@agliodbs.com>
X-Archive-Number: 200205/190
X-Sequence-Number: 7825

Bruce, Tom, Peter:

I was just checking the TODO list and noticed that none of my suggestions o=
r=20
John Proctors suggestions regarding PL/pgSQL improvements had made it on to=
=20
the list.  Is this because our ideas have been rejected, or because nobody=
=20
has time to deal with the TODO list?

--=20
-Josh Berkus

______AGLIO DATABASE SOLUTIONS___________________________
                                        Josh Berkus
   Complete information technology 	josh@agliodbs.com
    and data management solutions 	(415) 565-7293
   for law firms, small businesses 	 fax 621-2533
    and non-profit organizations. 	San Francisco