Received: from localhost.localdomain (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8]) by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTP id 351F2475F5C for ; Thu, 23 May 2002 04:21:02 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtp1.powertech.no (smtp1.powertech.no [195.159.0.145]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41013475473 for ; Thu, 23 May 2002 04:18:44 -0400 (EDT) Received: from gjedde (unknown [195.159.43.66]) by smtp1.powertech.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D3D78819; Thu, 23 May 2002 10:18:39 +0200 (CEST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" From: Denis To: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org Subject: Re: Further info : Very high load average but no cpu utilization ? Date: Thu, 23 May 2002 10:18:17 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.4.1 References: <200205111007.47338.mallah@trade-india.com> <20020513102120.6BB3C1AFD@druid.net> <200205131734.12619.mallah@trade-india.com> In-Reply-To: <200205131734.12619.mallah@trade-india.com> Cc: "Rajesh Kumar Mallah." MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-Id: <200205231018.17962.denis@startsiden.no> X-Archive-Number: 200205/250 X-Sequence-Number: 7885 On Monday 13 May 2002 02:04 pm, you wrote: > Hi, > > I vaguely remember postmaster not responding to > kill -9 even on Linux, > > i can confirm next time when (god forbids) my postmaster > goes crazy. ;-) > > i feel lucky now that my postmaster is up for more that > (24 hrs) > > (no offence intended , there have been instances of my postmaster > running for as long as 3 months) > > regds > mallah. I've been reading this thread with interest, may I ask a few additional questions ? - What version of postgresql are you running, compiled from tarball source or RPM version ? - Is there any good reason to still run this server on a RedHat 6.2 (non supported platform from RedHat) ? - How large are your databases, and how much usage do you have ? - What kinds of API's do you use to interface ? - Is the application running locally or do you use IP connections remotely ? Reason I am asking is that I still have never had postgresql go bad like that.. I can always stop it properly, and to this date have had very few problems with postgresql itself. I am interested in your problems because I'd like to be aware of issues I can eventually run into.. (Better care before than later ? :-) My own configuration is like this : - Postgresql 7.1.3 with OpenFTS, both compiled from source tarballs - Debian Linux 2.2.x platform - PHP and Perl applications accessing postgresql from remote machines via IP - Not very large databases (100s of MBs) but very frequent read, and quite frequent insert / update activity For the record, server uptime now is equal to the last time I rebooted for a kernel recompilation, and during that time I have been forced to restart postgresql only because of hangups on the Application servers (apache w. php / perl) .. Regards -- Denis Braekhus