Received: from candle.pha.pa.us (216-55-132-35.dsl.san-diego.abac.net [216.55.132.35]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9056475153 for ; Tue, 30 Jul 2002 11:26:40 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from pgman@localhost) by candle.pha.pa.us (8.11.6/8.10.1) id g6UFQS427981; Tue, 30 Jul 2002 11:26:28 -0400 (EDT) From: Bruce Momjian Message-Id: <200207301526.g6UFQS427981@candle.pha.pa.us> Subject: Re: contrib/dblink suggestion In-Reply-To: To: Bhuvan A Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2002 11:26:28 -0400 (EDT) Cc: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL99 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Archive-Number: 200207/446 X-Sequence-Number: 8824 dblink is fine to use, and will continue to be shipped with PostgreSQL. Not sure where you heard about problems with it. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Bhuvan A wrote: > Hi, > > I am using postgresql 7.2.1. > I badly require to interconnect between databases. contrib/dblink seems to > be handy and ofcourse it well suits my requirement. But while browsing > across, i heard that it is not advicable to use it. So i wish to know > someone's experience in using dblink and how handy it is. > > Will contrib/dblink be available with future postgresql releases? Valuable > suggestions are very welcome. > > TIA. > > regards, > bhuvaneswaran > > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command > (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to majordomo@postgresql.org) > -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000 + If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026