Received: from localhost (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
	by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28F244759FB
	for <pgsql-sql@postgresql.org>; Fri,  2 Aug 2002 19:13:58 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from davinci.ethosmedia.com (davinci.ethosmedia.com [209.10.40.250])
	by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 998094754A5
	for <pgsql-sql@postgresql.org>; Fri,  2 Aug 2002 19:13:57 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from [66.219.92.2] (HELO chocolate-mousse)
	by davinci.ethosmedia.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 3.5.9)
	with ESMTP id 1599065; Fri, 02 Aug 2002 16:13:58 -0700
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
From: Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>
Reply-To: josh@agliodbs.com
Organization: Aglio Database Solutions
To: Wei Weng <wweng@kencast.com>, pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: What about this?
Date: Fri, 2 Aug 2002 16:14:48 -0700
X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.4]
References: <1028324422.9762.57.camel@Monet>
In-Reply-To: <1028324422.9762.57.camel@Monet>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <200208021614.48181.josh@agliodbs.com>
X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS new-20020517
X-Archive-Number: 200208/48
X-Sequence-Number: 8894

Wei,

> Why can't postmaster run VACUUM ANALYZE automatically every once in a
> while? Since it is a very useful feature...

Because such a practice is not appropriate for everyone's database=20
installation, that's why.

--=20
-Josh Berkus
 Aglio Database Solutions
 San Francisco