Received: from localhost (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37E30476526 for ; Sun, 4 Aug 2002 01:54:24 -0400 (EDT) Received: from candle.pha.pa.us (216-55-132-35.dsl.san-diego.abac.net [216.55.132.35]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B874F47651F for ; Sun, 4 Aug 2002 01:54:22 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from pgman@localhost) by candle.pha.pa.us (8.11.6/8.10.1) id g745s8H02748; Sun, 4 Aug 2002 01:54:08 -0400 (EDT) From: Bruce Momjian Message-Id: <200208040554.g745s8H02748@candle.pha.pa.us> Subject: Re: Bug with dump/restore when using UNION and ORDER BY in views In-Reply-To: <7639.1028439037@sss.pgh.pa.us> To: Tom Lane Date: Sun, 4 Aug 2002 01:54:08 -0400 (EDT) Cc: Christopher Kings-Lynne , pgsql-sql@postgresql.org X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL99 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS new-20020517 X-Archive-Number: 200208/76 X-Sequence-Number: 8922 What is in the 7.2.X CVS that we would want to release? --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Tom Lane wrote: > "Christopher Kings-Lynne" writes: > >> Yeah. This is fixed in current sources, and I back-patched it into > >> the REL7_2 branch, but current plans don't seem to include a 7.2.2 > >> release --- we'll be going straight to 7.3 beta instead. > > > Is it worth doing a 7.2.2 patch that will dump people's foreign keys as > > ALTER TABLE/ADD FOREIGN KEY instead of a bunch of CREATE CONSTRAINT > > TRIGGERs, so that they actually become constraints in 7.3? > > I don't think it's any easier to do that as a backpatch than as new > functionality in 7.3 pg_dump. As far as the general issue of a 7.2.2 > release goes, I'm personally in favor of one --- there are several > important bugfixes in the 7.2 branch right now --- but I don't do the > gruntwork for patch releases, so I can't complain too much. > > > Also Tom - did you check if you can CREATE CONSTRAINT TRIGGER on a dropped > > column - I think I neglected to look at that in the patch I submitted > > originally. > > I'm pretty sure that won't get past the ATTNAME cache patches, but try > it... > > regards, tom lane > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? > > http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html > -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000 + If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026