Received: from localhost (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
	by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29842475F65
	for <pgsql-hackers@postgreSQL.org>;
	Wed, 28 Aug 2002 04:28:52 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ford.core.rockstorm.se (aurorum77-0.aurorum.se [213.88.249.77])
	by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F40F1475F5A
	for <pgsql-hackers@postgreSQL.org>;
	Wed, 28 Aug 2002 04:28:49 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from dot@localhost)
	by ford.core.rockstorm.se (8.11.0/8.11.0) id g7S8SfV23561;
	Wed, 28 Aug 2002 10:28:41 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2002 10:28:41 +0200
From: Magnus Enbom <dot@rockstorm.se>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgreSQL.org>
Subject: Re: [SQL] LIMIT 1 FOR UPDATE or FOR UPDATE LIMIT 1?
Message-ID: <20020828102841.A23539@ford.rockstorm.se>
Reply-To: magnus.enbom@rockstorm.se
References: <GNELIHDDFBOCMGBFGEFOMEOMCDAA.chriskl@familyhealth.com.au>
	<200208280245.g7S2jO803463@candle.pha.pa.us>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To: <200208280245.g7S2jO803463@candle.pha.pa.us>;
	from pgman@candle.pha.pa.us on Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 10:45:24PM
	-0400
X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS new-20020517
X-Archive-Number: 200208/2040
X-Sequence-Number: 27723

On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 10:45:24PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> 
> OK, patch attached.  It was actually easier than I thought.  We have to
> decide if we are going to remove the old syntax in 7.4.
> 
> Regression tests pass.  No doc updates yet.

Thanks alot! I don't mind keeping the old syntax. 

-- M