Received: from localhost (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
	by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB85B47657F
	for <pgsql-sql@postgresql.org>; Mon, 30 Sep 2002 13:27:40 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from davinci.ethosmedia.com (davinci.ethosmedia.com [209.10.40.250])
	by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E47347655B
	for <pgsql-sql@postgresql.org>; Mon, 30 Sep 2002 13:27:40 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from [66.219.92.2] (HELO chocolate-mousse)
	by davinci.ethosmedia.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 3.5.9)
	with ESMTP id 1734715; Mon, 30 Sep 2002 10:28:03 -0700
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
From: Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>
Reply-To: josh@agliodbs.com
Organization: Aglio Database Solutions
To: Mike Sosteric <mikes@athabascau.ca>
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] arrays
Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2002 10:29:34 -0700
X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.4]
Cc: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
References: 
 <Pine.SUN.3.96.1020930112405.16690H-100000@aupair.cs.athabascau.ca>
In-Reply-To: 
 <Pine.SUN.3.96.1020930112405.16690H-100000@aupair.cs.athabascau.ca>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <200209301029.34213.josh@agliodbs.com>
X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS new-20020517
X-Archive-Number: 200209/430
X-Sequence-Number: 9707


Mike,

> thanks for this. we will stick with the relational model.=20

Hey, don't make your decision entirely based on my advice.    Do some=20
research!  I'm just responding "off the cuff" to your questions.

If you do take the relational approach, post some sample problems here and=
=20
people can help you with how to represent XML data relationally.

--=20
-Josh Berkus
 Aglio Database Solutions
 San Francisco