Received: from localhost (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
	by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC07647610B
	for <pgsql-sql@postgresql.org>; Thu,  3 Oct 2002 23:01:22 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from wolff.to (wolff.to [66.93.197.35])
	by postgresql.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 37E3F4760CE
	for <pgsql-sql@postgresql.org>; Thu,  3 Oct 2002 23:01:22 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (qmail 3967 invoked by uid 500); 4 Oct 2002 03:09:54 -0000
Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2002 22:09:54 -0500
From: Bruno Wolff III <bruno@wolff.to>
To: Vincent-Olivier Arsenault <vincent@up4c.com>
Cc: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: order by x DESC, y ASC indexing problem
Message-ID: <20021004030954.GA3484@wolff.to>
Mail-Followup-To: Vincent-Olivier Arsenault <vincent@up4c.com>,
	pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
References: <3D9CF7EC.8080102@up4c.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <3D9CF7EC.8080102@up4c.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.25i
X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS new-20020517
X-Archive-Number: 200210/47
X-Sequence-Number: 9765

On Thu, Oct 03, 2002 at 22:07:40 -0400,
  Vincent-Olivier Arsenault <vincent@up4c.com> wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> I saw a posting regarding this issue in august, with no solution...

Then you didn't read the entire thread. You can create a new operator
class to get the desired behavior.