Received: from localhost (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
	by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22A0D4767B8
	for <pgsql-sql@postgresql.org>; Mon,  7 Oct 2002 20:13:48 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from davinci.ethosmedia.com (davinci.ethosmedia.com [209.10.40.250])
	by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AC0A4766E4
	for <pgsql-sql@postgresql.org>; Mon,  7 Oct 2002 20:13:47 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from [66.219.92.2] (HELO chocolate-mousse)
	by davinci.ethosmedia.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 3.5.9)
	with ESMTP id 1774767; Mon, 07 Oct 2002 17:12:23 -0700
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
From: Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>
Reply-To: josh@agliodbs.com
Organization: Aglio Database Solutions
To: Laurette Cisneros <laurette@nextbus.com>,
	pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: foreign key problem
Date: Sun, 6 Oct 2002 17:11:46 -0700
X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.4]
References: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0210071656570.19182-100000@visor.corp.nextbus.com>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0210071656570.19182-100000@visor.corp.nextbus.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <200210061711.46128.josh@agliodbs.com>
X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS new-20020517
X-Archive-Number: 200210/99
X-Sequence-Number: 9817

Laurette,

> How is this possible?  I've tried to reproduce this, but haven't been able
> to yet.  This has happened to use several times.

Oh, forgot question 2:
SELECT version()?

--=20
-Josh Berkus
 Aglio Database Solutions
 San Francisco