Received: from localhost (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
	by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5604747616F
	for <pgsql-sql@postgresql.org>; Wed, 23 Oct 2002 11:51:15 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from serwer.skawsoft.com.pl (serwer.skawsoft.com.pl [213.25.37.66])
	by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 827C9475FDE
	for <pgsql-sql@postgresql.org>; Wed, 23 Oct 2002 11:51:14 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from lamer.pl (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by serwer.skawsoft.com.pl (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 2381E2B4D8; Wed, 23 Oct 2002 17:44:45 +0200 (CEST)
From: "Tomasz Myrta" <jasiek@klaster.net>
To: Stephan Szabo <sszabo@megazone23.bigpanda.com>,
	Tomasz Myrta <jasiek@klaster.net>
Cc: <pgsql-sql@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: sub-select with aggregate
Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 17:44:45 +0900
Message-Id: <20021023174445.M37904@klaster.net>
In-Reply-To: <20021023081036.M5349-100000@megazone23.bigpanda.com>
References: <3DB6B7F7.2030609@klaster.net>
	<20021023081036.M5349-100000@megazone23.bigpanda.com>
X-Mailer: Open WebMail 1.62 20020221
X-OriginatingIP: 217.96.97.138 (jasiek)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-2
X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS new-20020517
X-Archive-Number: 200210/300
X-Sequence-Number: 10017

> On Wed, 23 Oct 2002, Tomasz Myrta wrote:
> 
> > Uz.ytkownik Stephan Szabo napisa?:
> Without group_id in the select list you couldn't do a where
> group_id = <something> if the select was a view.
I know - it was just example of query.

> Did you see the other two queries I gave?  On 7.3, both of those queries
> appear (according to explain output) to do the limiting of group_id
> inside the subquery rather than doing the subquery with all rows.
> The explanation above was why I believe it was different from your
> original query.
I saw them. So should I wait for 7.3? Currently I have 7.2 and my work 
stopped because of this.
Tomasz Myrta