Received: from localhost (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B287E475B07 for ; Sun, 3 Nov 2002 07:19:39 -0500 (EST) Received: from dyatel.antar.bryansk.ru (dyatel.antar.bryansk.ru [195.239.214.85]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2091F4758DC for ; Sun, 3 Nov 2002 07:19:39 -0500 (EST) Received: from drweb by dyatel.antar.bryansk.ru with drweb-scanned (Exim 4.10) id 188Jj5-0006vw-00; Sun, 03 Nov 2002 15:19:35 +0300 Received: from fduch by dyatel.antar.bryansk.ru with local (Exim 4.10) id 188Jj2-0006vl-00; Sun, 03 Nov 2002 15:19:32 +0300 Date: Sun, 3 Nov 2002 15:19:32 +0300 From: "Alexander M. Pravking" To: Bruce Momjian Cc: Tim Perdue , Maur?cio Sessue Otta , pgsql-sql@postgresql.org Subject: Re: Different size in the DATA directory Message-ID: <20021103121932.GA26315@dyatel.antar.bryansk.ru> References: <20021102143335.GC13252@dyatel.antar.bryansk.ru> <200211030120.gA31K4N00212@candle.pha.pa.us> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200211030120.gA31K4N00212@candle.pha.pa.us> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS new-20020517 X-Archive-Number: 200211/38 X-Sequence-Number: 10180 On Sat, Nov 02, 2002 at 08:20:04PM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote: > Alexander M. Pravking wrote: > > As I see, contrib/reindexdb requires perl for commandline > > procesing. I don't think it's a good idea, since > > e.g. FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT have no perl in standard distribution. > > > > Thomas, why not to use sed? > > No perl? I am no perl guy, but I assumed everyone had that already. > > I just looked at the code, and yes, it should use sed rather than perl, > especially since it is using it just for processing command line args. > > Seems it is a problem/bug for you. Patch applied to use sed rather than > perl. Well, I DO use perl, so it's not a problem for me :) But I see many people on these lists that do not. Thanks, Bruce. -- Fduch M. Pravking