Received: from localhost (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 908FB476021 for ; Fri, 8 Nov 2002 09:21:40 -0500 (EST) Received: from mps5.plala.or.jp (mpsb-nat22.plala.or.jp [202.212.115.69]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEE15476F2B for ; Fri, 8 Nov 2002 09:21:18 -0500 (EST) Received: from [192.168.0.4] ([218.47.116.9]) by mps5.plala.or.jp with ESMTP id <20021108142113.TZE6913.mps5.plala.or.jp@[192.168.0.4]>; Fri, 8 Nov 2002 23:21:13 +0900 Date: Fri, 08 Nov 2002 23:22:38 +0900 From: Masaru Sugawara To: Christoph Haller Subject: Re: query optimization question Cc: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org In-Reply-To: <3DCA2AF6.2D58D843@rodos.fzk.de> References: <200211070849.JAA01887@rodos> <3DCA2AF6.2D58D843@rodos.fzk.de> Errors-To: rk73@sea.plala.or.jp Message-Id: <20021108232146.DA83.RK73@sea.plala.or.jp> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Becky! ver. 2.05.05 X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS new-20020517 X-Archive-Number: 200211/135 X-Sequence-Number: 10277 On Thu, 07 Nov 2002 09:57:27 +0100 Christoph Haller wrote: > > ORDER BY proj.project_id ; > > What about simply replacing ORDER BY proj.project_id ; by > GROUP BY project_id, marketing_name ; You're right. Thanks a lot. Regards, Masaru Sugawara