Received: from localhost (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14495475EAA for ; Tue, 19 Nov 2002 18:40:34 -0500 (EST) Received: from web13805.mail.yahoo.com (web13805.mail.yahoo.com [216.136.175.15]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 647F0475DA7 for ; Tue, 19 Nov 2002 18:40:33 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <20021119234035.68562.qmail@web13805.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [216.173.173.66] by web13805.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Tue, 19 Nov 2002 15:40:35 PST Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2002 15:40:35 -0800 (PST) From: Chris Gamache Reply-To: cgg007@yahoo.com Subject: Re: Using VIEW to simplify code... To: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org In-Reply-To: <26637.1037747730@sss.pgh.pa.us> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS new-20020517 X-Archive-Number: 200211/289 X-Sequence-Number: 10431 --- Tom Lane wrote: > Stephan Szabo writes: > > On Tue, 19 Nov 2002, Chris Gamache wrote: > >> Understood. PostgreSQL 7.2.3. > > > 7.3 will be better for this. There were questions about the safety > > of pushing clauses down in queries with union and intersect and > > earlier versions wouldn't push down because we weren't sure it was > > safe. Except will still be problematic, but union and intersect should be > > much happier. > > Yeah, the UNIONs in the view are definitely the big problem. Can you > try on 7.3rc1 and see how it goes? That's something to look forward to! I'm going to have to hold off upgrading until y'all feel like 7.3rc1 should become 7.3.0. I wish we had a development environment to use, but we don't. I'll let you know how things fare after that. CG __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Web Hosting - Let the expert host your site http://webhosting.yahoo.com