Received: from localhost (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47DC6475B8D for ; Tue, 17 Dec 2002 10:30:33 -0500 (EST) Received: from krogh.officenet.no (unknown [193.212.174.47]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEF56475AE6 for ; Tue, 17 Dec 2002 10:30:32 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by krogh.officenet.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id F38DAA5164; Tue, 17 Dec 2002 10:23:50 -0500 (EST) From: Andreas Joseph Krogh Organization: OfficeNet AS To: Christoph Haller , gary.stainburn@ringways.co.uk Subject: Re: Upgrade question - was Re: join and dynamic view Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2002 16:23:50 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.5 Cc: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org References: <3DFF3E46.EDBB2EE6@rodos.fzk.de> In-Reply-To: <3DFF3E46.EDBB2EE6@rodos.fzk.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-2" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Description: clearsigned data Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200212171623.50674.andreak@officenet.no> X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS new-20020517 X-Archive-Number: 200212/209 X-Sequence-Number: 10797 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Tuesday 17 December 2002 16:09, Christoph Haller wrote: > > That explains it - the server I'm developing on is quite old - I > > didn't > > > realise how old. I'm about to do an upgrade from 7.1.3 to 7.2.1-5 > > over > > > christmas in fact. > > > > Will I need to dump/restore the database for this upgrade? As allways when version-upgrading(and not patch-level), you need to dump/restore as the binary on-disk format changes. - -- Andreas Joseph Krogh The difference between insanity and genius is measured by success -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE9/0GGUopImDh2gfQRAgJJAJ46UWmX4OBWogSHQOGOsO5w1+ZEDQCfcTFy XpXZyDZfRZAAHs1i7lixKQQ= =yI3q -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----