Received: from localhost (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
	by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 6DFAD475FDD; Thu,  9 Jan 2003 18:03:22 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ece.rice.edu (ece.rice.edu [128.42.4.34])
	by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 04011475F37; Thu,  9 Jan 2003 18:03:22 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by ece.rice.edu (Postfix) with SMTP
	id 4C53168A99; Thu,  9 Jan 2003 17:03:24 -0600 (CST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by ece.rice.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id DFD3A68A98; Thu,  9 Jan 2003 17:03:23 -0600 (CST)
Received: from wallace.ece.rice.edu (wallace.ece.rice.edu [128.42.12.154])
	by ece.rice.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id B6E9E68A96; Thu,  9 Jan 2003 17:03:22 -0600 (CST)
Received: from reedstrm by wallace.ece.rice.edu with local (Exim 3.36 #1
	(Debian)) id 18Wlhq-0008HE-00; Thu, 09 Jan 2003 17:03:22 -0600
Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2003 17:03:22 -0600
From: "Ross J. Reedstrom" <reedstrm@rice.edu>
To: "Rajesh Kumar Mallah." <mallah@trade-india.com>
Cc: "Randy D. McCracken" <rdm@srs.fs.usda.gov>,
	pgsql-sql@postgresql.org, pgsql-novice@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Search and Replace
Message-ID: <20030109230322.GC30740@wallace.ece.rice.edu>
Mail-Followup-To: "Ross J. Reedstrom" <reedstrm@ece.rice.edu>,
	"Rajesh Kumar Mallah." <mallah@trade-india.com>,
	"Randy D. McCracken" <rdm@srs.fs.usda.gov>, pgsql-sql@postgresql.org,
	pgsql-novice@postgresql.org
References: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0301081506150.7559-100000@www.srs.fs.usda.gov>
	<200301091100.32667.mallah@trade-india.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <200301091100.32667.mallah@trade-india.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i
X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS snapshot-20020300
X-DCC--Metrics: ece.rice.edu 1067; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1
X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS new-20020517
X-Archive-Number: 200301/140
X-Sequence-Number: 11005

On Thu, Jan 09, 2003 at 11:00:32AM +0530, Rajesh Kumar Mallah. wrote:
> 
> any anyone explain whats wrong with the replace based solution to this problem
> which i posted earlier?
> 
> did i misunderstood anything?

Probably just overkill - I'm sure it would work, but, based on how the
question was asked, I guessed that the original questioner was looking
for a quick, onetime fix sort of thing, and wasn't real comfortable with
SQL, let alone adding contrib extension products to the installation.

Ross