Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2003 11:50:13 -0700
From: Roberto Mello <rmello@cc.usu.edu>
To: Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>
Cc: Johnny Kristensen <johnnybo1@mail.tele.dk>,
	pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: SQL Functions vs PL/PgSQL
Message-ID: <20030213185013.GA8794@cc.usu.edu>
References: <000801c2d2e0$edd32420$dc9ac450@johnny>
	<200302130902.05987.josh@agliodbs.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <200302130902.05987.josh@agliodbs.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i

On Thu, Feb 13, 2003 at 09:02:05AM -0800, Josh Berkus wrote:
> Johnny,
> 
> > Does postgres store execution plan's for user-defined SQL functions as the
> > PL/pgSQL interpreter does. And if so - will this only be prepared after an
> > initial call to the function? Can't seem to find this information in the
> > docs!? Thanks,
> 
> Unless you know something I don't, I do not believe that PL/pgSQL stores 
> execution plans for functions.

AFAIK execution plans for PL/pgSQL functions were cached once per backend.
No?

-Roberto

-- 
+----|        Roberto Mello   -    http://www.brasileiro.net/  |------+
+       Computer Science Graduate Student, Utah State University      +
+       USU Free Software & GNU/Linux Club - http://fslc.usu.edu/     +
If CPU < 486 then upgrade (486,OS/2 3.0) : while < 586...