X-Original-To: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org Received: from localhost (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DD7D475B07 for ; Fri, 21 Feb 2003 18:33:39 -0500 (EST) Received: from postgresql.org ([64.49.215.8]) by localhost (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8:10024]) (amavisd-new) with SMTP id 03906-07 for ; Fri, 21 Feb 2003 18:33:11 -0500 (EST) Received: from davinci.ethosmedia.com (unknown [209.10.40.251]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FAC7475C60 for ; Fri, 21 Feb 2003 18:26:11 -0500 (EST) Received: from [66.219.92.2] (HELO chocolate-mousse) by davinci.ethosmedia.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.0.2) with ESMTP id 2851987; Fri, 21 Feb 2003 15:26:21 -0800 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" From: Josh Berkus Reply-To: josh@agliodbs.com Organization: Aglio Database Solutions To: "Chad Thompson" , "Dan Langille" Subject: Re: 7.3 "group by" issue Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2003 15:25:55 -0800 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.4] Cc: References: <3E5649A9.26494.1F008FD6@localhost> <053901c2d9eb$0cd85000$32021aac@chad> In-Reply-To: <053901c2d9eb$0cd85000$32021aac@chad> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <200302211525.55609.josh@agliodbs.com> X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new X-Archive-Number: 200302/493 X-Sequence-Number: 11891 Dan, Chad, > I see the distinction you are making. >=20 > Maybe Tom or Josh could throw out a better answer, but I think that youve > called it one thing in your select and tried to group by it using a > syntaticly different name. This looks like a bug to me. Please write it up and send it to BUGS. 7.3.2, I assume? --=20 -Josh Berkus Aglio Database Solutions San Francisco