X-Original-To: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org Received: from xeon.unixathome.org (bast.unixathome.org [66.11.174.150]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FDF3476363 for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2003 17:57:51 -0500 (EST) Received: by xeon.unixathome.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 55B2A3F4A; Wed, 12 Mar 2003 17:59:53 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by xeon.unixathome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 490D33F49; Wed, 12 Mar 2003 17:59:53 -0500 (EST) Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2003 17:59:53 -0500 (EST) From: Dan Langille X-X-Sender: dan@xeon.unixathome.org To: Stephan Szabo Cc: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org Subject: Re: extending ORDER BY make query much slower In-Reply-To: <20030312134250.D56401-100000@megazone23.bigpanda.com> Message-ID: <20030312173949.H95239@xeon.unixathome.org> References: <20030312134250.D56401-100000@megazone23.bigpanda.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Archive-Number: 200303/322 X-Sequence-Number: 12361 On Wed, 12 Mar 2003, Stephan Szabo wrote: > As a question, is it faster if both are marked DESC? FWIW, no. But see my reply to Tom.