X-Original-To: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org Received: from spampd.localdomain (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE341475FC8 for ; Thu, 17 Apr 2003 04:21:28 -0400 (EDT) Received: from rtlocal.trade-india.com (mail-relay.trade-india.com [203.196.129.235]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A89924758F1 for ; Thu, 17 Apr 2003 04:21:21 -0400 (EDT) Received: (qmail 10353 invoked from network); 17 Apr 2003 08:24:08 -0000 Received: from system67.trade-india-local.com (192.168.0.67) by infocom-236-129-del.trade-india.com with SMTP; 17 Apr 2003 08:24:08 -0000 From: Rajesh Kumar Mallah Organization: Infocom Network Limited To: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org Subject: analyse question.. Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2003 13:51:19 +0530 User-Agent: KMail/1.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200304171351.19189.mallah@trade-india.com> X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_01,SIGNATURE_SHORT_SPARSE,USER_AGENT version=2.50 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.50 (1.173-2003-02-20-exp) X-Archive-Number: 200304/258 X-Sequence-Number: 12959 Do we need to analyze a table after indexing ? we observed that an already analyzed table had to be re-analyzed after index creation for index usage . is it normal behaviour? regds mallah. -- Rajesh Kumar Mallah, Project Manager (Development) Infocom Network Limited, New Delhi phone: +91(11)6152172 (221) (L) ,9811255597 (M) Visit http://www.trade-india.com , India's Leading B2B eMarketplace.