X-Original-To: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
Received: from spampd.localdomain (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
	by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA080475AE4
	for <pgsql-sql@postgresql.org>; Sat, 19 Apr 2003 12:30:25 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from megazone.bigpanda.com (megazone.bigpanda.com [63.150.15.178])
	by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2023F4758C9
	for <pgsql-sql@postgresql.org>; Sat, 19 Apr 2003 12:30:20 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by megazone.bigpanda.com (Postfix, from userid 1001)
	id 6AEFCD609; Sat, 19 Apr 2003 09:30:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by megazone.bigpanda.com (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 60AB65C03; Sat, 19 Apr 2003 09:30:25 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2003 09:30:25 -0700 (PDT)
From: Stephan Szabo <sszabo@megazone23.bigpanda.com>
To: Rajesh Kumar Mallah <mallah@trade-india.com>
Cc: <pgsql-sql@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: apparent problem with a PL
In-Reply-To: <200304191238.08953.mallah@trade-india.com>
Message-ID: <20030419092840.W17389-100000@megazone23.bigpanda.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-26.0 required=5.0
	tests=BAYES_01,EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,IN_REP_TO,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,
	REPLY_WITH_QUOTES autolearn=ham	version=2.50
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.50 (1.173-2003-02-20-exp)
X-Archive-Number: 200304/302
X-Sequence-Number: 13003

On Sat, 19 Apr 2003, Rajesh Kumar Mallah wrote:

> Thanks so much for responding
> so i assume its harmless rite?

Basically yes, excepting that any side effects are done 1 "too many"
times.

> But the second problem (refer next posting) seems to be serious
> any comments? do u want me to post more details?

Unfortunately I've never build plperl (and I don't think I have a shared
libperl) so I'm not really sure.  I think there was a message about
something similar in the past, so you might be able to find something
in the archives (a bug where something was cleared maybe?)