X-Original-To: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org Received: from spampd.localdomain (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E070C4763B0 for ; Fri, 2 May 2003 12:33:57 -0400 (EDT) Received: from megazone.bigpanda.com (megazone.bigpanda.com [63.150.15.178]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6B3E475E9D for ; Fri, 2 May 2003 12:33:53 -0400 (EDT) Received: by megazone.bigpanda.com (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 16F19D646; Fri, 2 May 2003 09:33:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by megazone.bigpanda.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CA125C0B; Fri, 2 May 2003 09:33:59 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 2 May 2003 09:33:58 -0700 (PDT) From: Stephan Szabo To: Matt Mello Cc: , Subject: Re: implied FROM In-Reply-To: <59964.24.243.219.116.1051883093.squirrel@earth.spaceship.com> Message-ID: <20030502093219.K65288-100000@megazone23.bigpanda.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-26.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_01,EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,IN_REP_TO,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT, REPLY_WITH_QUOTES autolearn=ham version=2.50 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.50 (1.173-2003-02-20-exp) X-Archive-Number: 200305/31 X-Sequence-Number: 13196 On Fri, 2 May 2003, Matt Mello wrote: > Tomasz Myrta said: > > > > Some people > > said, that it is very useful inside update queries. The conclusion was > > this behaviour should stay as it is. > > We should at least have the ability to change a PG setting to say that we DO > NOT WANT PG to try to second guess us ('set FORDUMMYS = false', or > whatever). In my mind, this "feature" is a violation of the spirit of SQL. > I wish I was on this list for the "vote" everyone took on this. Actually 7.4 should have an GUC option for this (enable_implicit_from), see recent posts to -patches.