X-Original-To: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
Received: from spampd.localdomain (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
	by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BA9E47638E
	for <pgsql-sql@postgresql.org>; Wed,  7 May 2003 11:38:23 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from wolff.to (wolff.to [66.93.249.74])
	by postgresql.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 69C5C4763CE
	for <pgsql-sql@postgresql.org>; Wed,  7 May 2003 11:38:22 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (qmail 26182 invoked by uid 500); 7 May 2003 15:39:38 -0000
Date: Wed, 7 May 2003 10:39:38 -0500
From: Bruno Wolff III <bruno@wolff.to>
To: Thomas Good <tomg@sqlclinic.net>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Ian Barwick <barwick@gmx.net>,
	Postgres SQL List <pgsql-sql@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: Date Anomaly??
Message-ID: <20030507153938.GA26150@wolff.to>
Mail-Followup-To: Thomas Good <tomg@sqlclinic.net>,
	Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Ian Barwick <barwick@gmx.net>,
	Postgres SQL List <pgsql-sql@postgresql.org>
References: <26997.1052317914@sss.pgh.pa.us>
	<Pine.LNX.4.44.0305071047270.29670-100000@q8.nrnet.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0305071047270.29670-100000@q8.nrnet.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-34.8 required=5.0
	tests=BAYES_10,EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,IN_REP_TO,REFERENCES,
	REPLY_WITH_QUOTES,USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=ham	version=2.50
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.50 (1.173-2003-02-20-exp)
X-Archive-Number: 200305/129
X-Sequence-Number: 13294

On Wed, May 07, 2003 at 11:04:28 -0400,
  Thomas Good <tomg@sqlclinic.net> wrote:
> 
> Bottom line: there is no way to return a MM-DD-YYYY value?

You can always use to_char to return the date as a string in a format you want.