X-Original-To: pgsql-general@postgresql.org Received: from spampd.localdomain (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B26247636B for ; Thu, 8 May 2003 09:21:26 -0400 (EDT) Received: from wolff.to (wolff.to [66.93.249.74]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9FB3E474E4F for ; Thu, 8 May 2003 09:21:25 -0400 (EDT) Received: (qmail 1534 invoked by uid 500); 8 May 2003 13:22:42 -0000 Date: Thu, 8 May 2003 08:22:42 -0500 From: Bruno Wolff III To: Jon Earle Cc: Oliver Elphick , Richard Huxton , pgsql-general@postgresql.org Subject: Re: PostgreSQL Qs Message-ID: <20030508132242.GB1451@wolff.to> Mail-Followup-To: Jon Earle , Oliver Elphick , Richard Huxton , pgsql-general@postgresql.org References: <200305071832.22529.dev@archonet.com> <1052337828.21371.15.camel@linda.lfix.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-38.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_10,EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,IN_REP_TO,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT, REFERENCES,REPLY_WITH_QUOTES,USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=ham version=2.50 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.50 (1.173-2003-02-20-exp) X-Archive-Number: 200305/255 X-Sequence-Number: 41910 On Wed, May 07, 2003 at 16:19:10 -0400, Jon Earle wrote: > On Wed, 7 May 2003, Oliver Elphick wrote: > > > I assume he is using Debian stable, which has 7.2.1 (and will have for > > evermore, dammit!, until the next stable release.) > > Yes, that's what I'm using (v7.2.1-2woody2). Is it worth upgrading? You should at least upgrade to 7.2.4 as there are important bug fixes. You won't have to do an initdb to do that upgrade. You might want to upgrade to 7.3.2 as there are some nice new features, but you will have to be more careful about the upgrade process to make sure some of the changes don't cause problems.